RINP // CYBERSECURITY SERVICES
Services Hub · Cybersecurity decision guide
Start the right security engagement with the right question.
First we define the asset to protect and the question to answer. Then we select the appropriate scope from among our penetration testing, Red Team, and AI security services.
- Each service is explained through the security finding it verifies, the business risk it addresses, and the management and technical outputs it delivers.
- Scope distinctions across offensive security engagements are kept visible; one-time testing, continuous testing, and attack-path validation are treated as separate decisions.
The service portfolio by your priority
Nine services are grouped under application, infrastructure, human, resilience, and AI security headings. Each card explains which question the engagement answers and which output it produces.
Application Security Penetration Testing
Verified security findings and exploitable authorization flaws are identified in critical business workflows; the output is a prioritized remediation list with an initial remediation order assigned.
How it differs from Continuous Penetration Testing: it offers one-time depth rather than a release cadence.
Continuous Validation · PT-5
Continuous Penetration Testing
Measurable remediation visibility is provided through cadence, post-remediation retest, and remediate-and-verify discipline; the output is a trend report tracking the release tempo.
How it differs from Application Security Penetration Testing: it centers on continuous cadence and remediation visibility rather than one-time deep validation.
Network Security Penetration Testing
Verified security findings, chainable access flaws, segmentation impact, and a prioritized remediation track are provided.
How it differs from Modular Red Team Simulation: it centers on the risk across the network surface rather than the attack path chain.
Penetration Test · PT-3
Cloud Security Penetration Testing
The initial remediation order is established through privilege escalation chains, data access paths, and transitive privilege visibility in the cloud.
How it differs from Application Security Penetration Testing: it centers on the cloud privilege chain rather than the application flow.
Generative AI Red Team
Abuse paths and the control that breaks the chain are identified across the prompt, tool, data, and authorization chain (including RAG and MCP integrations).
How it differs from AI Model Supply Chain Assurance: it centers on the runtime chain rather than the model's supply-chain trust.
AI Security · AIS-2
AI Model Supply Chain Assurance
Source provenance, the component list, gaps in the attestation, registry trust, and release-pipeline evidence are examined.
How it differs from Generative AI Red Team: it centers on the model's supply-chain trust rather than runtime agent behavior.
Offensive AI Enablement · AI-FOR-PT
AI for Penetration Testing and Red Team
Internal offensive workflow design, an approval model, an evaluation set, observability, and a controlled pilot are carried out.
How it differs from Generative AI Red Team: it centers on the internal workflow lever rather than testing an external customer product.
// APPROACH
Every engagement carries the verified security finding into an actionable decision.
Commonly confused service distinctions
Commonly confused services are distinguished by target, testing cadence, expected evidence, and decision need. This table makes it easier to choose the right first step for your organization.
| Pair | Right starting point for A | Right starting point for B | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Application Security · Continuous Pentest | One-time depth; new-release or critical-flow validation; the output is a prioritized remediation list. | Cadence and post-remediation retest; continuous release tempo; the output is remediation visibility. | Compare |
| Application · Cloud Security Pentest | Application flow, business logic, and authorization boundary; the output is the evidence chain of the critical flow. | Cloud privilege chain, data access path, and IAM; the output is a transitive privilege map. | Compare |
| Continuous Pentest · Modular Red Team | Application validation cadence; the output is a remediation trend across the release tempo. | Attack path, critical-target impact, detection gap; the output is the control that breaks the chain. | Compare |
| Portable trust · Audit-ready trust | A defensible package for third-party customer reviews; the output is a control mapping. | Evidence for audit, regulation, and management; the output is an executive summary with remediation evidence. | Compare |
| Generative AI Red Team · Model Supply-Chain | Runtime chain, agent behavior; the output is the control that breaks the chain. | The model's supply-chain trust, source provenance, attestation; the output is registry and BOM visibility. | Compare |
| Generative AI Red Team · AI for Pentest | The customer's AI product is the object under test; the output is runtime chain evidence. | The Red in Pulse offensive pipeline is the object being improved; the output is a workflow and evaluation set. | Compare |
A shared risk picture for management and the technical team
The executive summary and the technical report draw on the same verified findings. Findings are ranked by business impact and exploitability. After the customer's remediation, the necessary findings are retested.
Management delivery
- Executive summary and decision context: not a list of findings, but a defensible decision picture is presented.
- Defensible risk picture and priority map: the relationship between business impact and segmentation is shown in a table.
- Control effectiveness and remediation report: management visibility is provided with post-remediation retest evidence.
Technical delivery
- Reproducible findings report: it includes manually performed validation, a safe PoC, and a technical evidence chain.
- A prioritized remediation list with clear ownership and ordering: sorted by business impact, exploitability, and segmentation.
- Post-remediation retest and control follow-up: measurable remediation evidence is provided, not a written attestation.
// DISCOVERY
Let's determine the security engagement that fits your priority together
By discussing the critical asset, the decision need, and the expected output, we clarify the right service and the initial scope.